CTRL+ALT+AG
latest news
Podcast:Yahtzee joins to talk GH4, SSBB, and out of control kids
News:GTAIV to give aussies an R rating?
News:Hookers, Halo and Fraud - The life and times of Ralph in Texas
News:Super Smash Brothers Brawl - Finally
News:Lego Indy Demo
News:Too Human Coming Soon - Finally
News:A guide to importing Rock Band
News:Blue Dingos rendition of Finish the Fight
10 Questions:10 Game Industry Questions - Rob Davis
News:He Was A Fattish But Active Man, Of Paralyzing Stupidity
News:IGN turning into RALPH?
News:If Nintendo had made Halo 3
News:Ballarat Get into Games - This Weekend!
News:GTA IV won't help you become a serial killer
Podcast:Sony Gamers Day and ... well ... GTA IV news, what else!
News:GTAIV to give aussies an R rating?
News:Hookers, Halo and Fraud - The life and times of Ralph in Texas
News:Super Smash Brothers Brawl - Finally
News:Lego Indy Demo
News:Too Human Coming Soon - Finally
News:A guide to importing Rock Band
News:Blue Dingos rendition of Finish the Fight
10 Questions:10 Game Industry Questions - Rob Davis
News:He Was A Fattish But Active Man, Of Paralyzing Stupidity
News:IGN turning into RALPH?
News:If Nintendo had made Halo 3
News:Ballarat Get into Games - This Weekend!
News:GTA IV won't help you become a serial killer
Podcast:Sony Gamers Day and ... well ... GTA IV news, what else!
latest podcast
random quote
“I would also like to point out that Bendon and Berlei Bra companies would have an easy time here as all these women have exactly the same sizes breasts, actually it’s only their hair colour that changes – maybe it’s some Conan groupie with a great selection of wigs?”
'Conan' Reviewby Cav
most recent on forum
Help Aussie kids learn! by SniperXtreme at 2:10am
Late Podcast by SniperXtreme at 2:08am
PODCAST [ Yahtzee joins to talk GH4, SSBB, and out of control kids ] by Rhuri at 1:58am
English Literacy in Aus by itsapanda at 1:05am
want by fic_kitty at 1:01am
Heaven... by The Laughing Man at 12:11am
<AG XBOX360 COD4 1 on 1 TOURNEY> by Claude the Duck King at 11:47pm
Introduce Yourself by funkypea at 11:32pm
PODCAST [ Sony Gamers Day and ... well ... GTA IV news, what else! ] by El Taco at 11:11pm
Your latest purchase by Jay at 10:59pm
How do you visual minorites? by funkypea at 10:49pm
Fire Emblem by Amyler at 9:57pm
MC Chris by EdgeCrusher at 8:52pm
NEWS [ Too Human Coming Soon - Finally ] by netjunkie at 8:39pm
Dreamscene by AJ at 8:12pm
Late Podcast by SniperXtreme at 2:08am
PODCAST [ Yahtzee joins to talk GH4, SSBB, and out of control kids ] by Rhuri at 1:58am
English Literacy in Aus by itsapanda at 1:05am
want by fic_kitty at 1:01am
Heaven... by The Laughing Man at 12:11am
<AG XBOX360 COD4 1 on 1 TOURNEY> by Claude the Duck King at 11:47pm
Introduce Yourself by funkypea at 11:32pm
PODCAST [ Sony Gamers Day and ... well ... GTA IV news, what else! ] by El Taco at 11:11pm
Your latest purchase by Jay at 10:59pm
How do you visual minorites? by funkypea at 10:49pm
Fire Emblem by Amyler at 9:57pm
MC Chris by EdgeCrusher at 8:52pm
NEWS [ Too Human Coming Soon - Finally ] by netjunkie at 8:39pm
Dreamscene by AJ at 8:12pm
upcoming releases
NDS
22 May
Apollo Justice Ace AttorneyPS3
22 May
BUZZ Quiz TVWII
22 May
Dream Pinball 3DNDS
22 May
Dream Pinball 3DPC
22 May
Dream Pinball 3DPS2
23 May
Silent Hill OriginsX360
23 May
Top Spin 3PS3
23 May
Top Spin 3WII
23 May
Top Spin 3NDS
23 May
Top Spin 3PC
23 May
Top Trumps: Dr WhoPS2
23 May
Top Trumps: Dr Whorss feeds
Australian Gamer Content - All
Australian Gamer Podcasts - All
Australian Gamer Updates, Reviews, Previews, Features
what's new
feature :: the r rating for videogames in australia
The R Rating for Videogames in Australia
Matt's definitive article on the lack of an R rating for video games in Australia, who's to blame, and what we can do about it.
I'm going to admit right up front that this isn't new content. It was written for a comic, in what Yug dismissively calls "the rant". I felt it would be of benefit to put it into a separate article, allowing the feature to be accessed directly, not to mention... *cough* spidered by google. I have removed some of the more colourful phrasings for a more general audience.
The original is located here.
There has been a lot of increased interest in the R rating in Australia, and if nothing else this serves to benefit our cause as the lack of knowledge is a major hurdle. Many gamers are not even aware that there's no R rating, and many non-gamers would also be offended if they knew the truth, the religious nanny state that seeks to protect 30 and 40 year olds from naughty games
The other problem with this issue is that there's a lot of misinformation about it. As soon as a game is "banned" people immediately jump to blame the OFLC.
The OFLC
I want to therefore clarify something straight up. The OFLC have never ever banned a game. That's not what they do. The responsibility of the Office of Film and Literature Classification is to provide the appropriate rating for any content submitted to them. Where they cannot provide an appropriate rating they must refuse to classify it. An unclassified game (or movie) cannot be sold in Australia. While in effect it is a "ban" it's important to be clear that the OFLC is not a censorship board. The "C" stands for Classification, not Censorship.
Blaming the OFLC is just shooting the messenger. The problem is the message, and the message is that gamers are children. The numbers, the facts, do not back this up. The video games industry is not made up entirely of ignorant kids, despite what the Australian Government and Nintendo think.
Why don't we have an R rating?
NightTrap. In 1993 a Labor Senator, Margaret Reynolds, saw or heard about, or was told misleading nonsense about the video game "NightTrap". She was appalled and outraged and began a senate committe looking into video games. The findings they made were inconclusive by any standard other than moral outrage. They decided that gamers were children, and that violence in video games has more impact than movies and should be rated accordingly. These findings were built upon in later papers that were used to build the Australian censorship code. Later controversial games such as Phantasmagoria built on and confirmed these findings, either with their actual content or with nonsense and half truths based on it.
How do we get an R rating? (and why we don't part B)
This is the crux of the matter, and cruxy indeed it is. The OFLC guidelines can be reviewed, twice a year at a meeting of the Attorneys-General. Each state has an Attorney-General, and they define local censorship laws. Changing federal laws are a bit trickier though. The problem is that any change made to OFLC guidelines has to be approved by the Attorneys General of every state, and also ratified by the federal Attorney-General.
The OFLC themselves can make recommendations on their guidelines and have done many times. Among their recommendations in 2001 were - get this - an R rating for video games. In fact, in general the OFLC recommends the reduction and simplification of existing guidelines. They're quite an interesting read if you're an incredible nerd. I enjoyed them.
In 2001 the OFLC recommended the addition of an R rating to video games, in consideration of the age of players, and their own code, which right up states "adults should be able to read, hear and see what they want". However, when put before the standing committee one man refused to discuss it.
Michael Atkinson, the South Australian Attorney General.
Mr Michael Atkinson
Michael Atkinson is a long-serving conservative Labor Christian who happens to be the federal member for Croydon, one of the safest Labor seats in Australia. He also has a reputation as a man who uses his power and position to force his own moral view on the public, both in his own province of South Australia and in the rest of Australia where possible.
My opinion is that the goverment should pretty much piss off and leave me alone. No government or agency of said goverment should have any right to tell me, as a taxpaying citizen, what to do as long as I harm no one and break no laws. So I honestly cannot even begin to comprehend the position of a man such as Michael Atkinson, a man whose literal job is telling me what to do regardless of the fact that I've done no harm and broken no laws. Atkinson's views are that he's the last bastion, the dam that holds back a wave of moral depravity. My view is that he's a conservative Christian forcing his personal and religious views on a country despite vast opposition to them.
Using a religion, ignorance or public sentimentality has long been an excellent way to obscure civil rights abuses. Concealed beneath the concept of "protecting the children" it is OUR rights that are being violated. By claiming to be protecting minors he is interfering with my personal choice as an adult, a concept that not only do I respectfully disagree with but reject with all ferocity and rage I can possibly bear.
So what can I do?
Nothing.
What? You expected more than that? You wanted some call-to-action, an extravagant exortation to mount a letter writing campaign? Some sort of long term strategy involving the word "ombudsman"? The fact is it won't make any difference. Australia will never get an R rating while Atkinson is in his position. He's said that outright. Australia will not get an R rating because Jesus wouldn't like it. Those weren't his exact words, I'm just trying to make sure it sounds as stupid, insulting, and ethically apalling as it is.
Australia has no Bill of Rights, and a very boring constitution, with no fancy amendments. We have no official freedom of speech, and Seperation of Church and State is a fiction many here wrongly assume we have because the US purportedly does. In any case, this is particularly interesting in terms of video games in that many of the challenges to the games industry have been resolved on First Amendment (Freedom of Speech) grounds. Australia lacks that basis to fight for our rights.
In fact, we lack any basis to fight at all.
If you happen to be a state Attorney-General, maybe you can make a difference. If you're a gamer, and thinking you live in a democracy and the will of 88% of the population carries any merit... think again.
The original is located here.
There has been a lot of increased interest in the R rating in Australia, and if nothing else this serves to benefit our cause as the lack of knowledge is a major hurdle. Many gamers are not even aware that there's no R rating, and many non-gamers would also be offended if they knew the truth, the religious nanny state that seeks to protect 30 and 40 year olds from naughty games
The other problem with this issue is that there's a lot of misinformation about it. As soon as a game is "banned" people immediately jump to blame the OFLC.
The OFLC
I want to therefore clarify something straight up. The OFLC have never ever banned a game. That's not what they do. The responsibility of the Office of Film and Literature Classification is to provide the appropriate rating for any content submitted to them. Where they cannot provide an appropriate rating they must refuse to classify it. An unclassified game (or movie) cannot be sold in Australia. While in effect it is a "ban" it's important to be clear that the OFLC is not a censorship board. The "C" stands for Classification, not Censorship.
Blaming the OFLC is just shooting the messenger. The problem is the message, and the message is that gamers are children. The numbers, the facts, do not back this up. The video games industry is not made up entirely of ignorant kids, despite what the Australian Government and Nintendo think.
Why don't we have an R rating?
NightTrap. In 1993 a Labor Senator, Margaret Reynolds, saw or heard about, or was told misleading nonsense about the video game "NightTrap". She was appalled and outraged and began a senate committe looking into video games. The findings they made were inconclusive by any standard other than moral outrage. They decided that gamers were children, and that violence in video games has more impact than movies and should be rated accordingly. These findings were built upon in later papers that were used to build the Australian censorship code. Later controversial games such as Phantasmagoria built on and confirmed these findings, either with their actual content or with nonsense and half truths based on it.
How do we get an R rating? (and why we don't part B)
This is the crux of the matter, and cruxy indeed it is. The OFLC guidelines can be reviewed, twice a year at a meeting of the Attorneys-General. Each state has an Attorney-General, and they define local censorship laws. Changing federal laws are a bit trickier though. The problem is that any change made to OFLC guidelines has to be approved by the Attorneys General of every state, and also ratified by the federal Attorney-General.
The OFLC themselves can make recommendations on their guidelines and have done many times. Among their recommendations in 2001 were - get this - an R rating for video games. In fact, in general the OFLC recommends the reduction and simplification of existing guidelines. They're quite an interesting read if you're an incredible nerd. I enjoyed them.
In 2001 the OFLC recommended the addition of an R rating to video games, in consideration of the age of players, and their own code, which right up states "adults should be able to read, hear and see what they want". However, when put before the standing committee one man refused to discuss it.
Michael Atkinson, the South Australian Attorney General.
Mr Michael Atkinson
Michael Atkinson is a long-serving conservative Labor Christian who happens to be the federal member for Croydon, one of the safest Labor seats in Australia. He also has a reputation as a man who uses his power and position to force his own moral view on the public, both in his own province of South Australia and in the rest of Australia where possible.
My opinion is that the goverment should pretty much piss off and leave me alone. No government or agency of said goverment should have any right to tell me, as a taxpaying citizen, what to do as long as I harm no one and break no laws. So I honestly cannot even begin to comprehend the position of a man such as Michael Atkinson, a man whose literal job is telling me what to do regardless of the fact that I've done no harm and broken no laws. Atkinson's views are that he's the last bastion, the dam that holds back a wave of moral depravity. My view is that he's a conservative Christian forcing his personal and religious views on a country despite vast opposition to them.
Using a religion, ignorance or public sentimentality has long been an excellent way to obscure civil rights abuses. Concealed beneath the concept of "protecting the children" it is OUR rights that are being violated. By claiming to be protecting minors he is interfering with my personal choice as an adult, a concept that not only do I respectfully disagree with but reject with all ferocity and rage I can possibly bear.
So what can I do?
Nothing.
What? You expected more than that? You wanted some call-to-action, an extravagant exortation to mount a letter writing campaign? Some sort of long term strategy involving the word "ombudsman"? The fact is it won't make any difference. Australia will never get an R rating while Atkinson is in his position. He's said that outright. Australia will not get an R rating because Jesus wouldn't like it. Those weren't his exact words, I'm just trying to make sure it sounds as stupid, insulting, and ethically apalling as it is.
Australia has no Bill of Rights, and a very boring constitution, with no fancy amendments. We have no official freedom of speech, and Seperation of Church and State is a fiction many here wrongly assume we have because the US purportedly does. In any case, this is particularly interesting in terms of video games in that many of the challenges to the games industry have been resolved on First Amendment (Freedom of Speech) grounds. Australia lacks that basis to fight for our rights.
In fact, we lack any basis to fight at all.
If you happen to be a state Attorney-General, maybe you can make a difference. If you're a gamer, and thinking you live in a democracy and the will of 88% of the population carries any merit... think again.