It is true that I am opposed to an R18+ category for interactive games, but I am one of at least four attorneys so opposed.
I welcome a challenge in my electorate of Croydon at the next general election on this issue.
Among my constituents are hundreds of refugees who are trying to find lodgings for the family, gain employment and sponsor relatives from the old country.
Their vote is hardly likely to hinge on the “right” to score gamer points on the computer screen by running down and killing pedestrians on the pavement, raping a mother and her two daughters, blowing oneself up in a market, cutting people in half with large calibre shells, injecting drugs to win an athletics event or killing a prostitute to recover the fee one just paid her (Welcome to the world of R18+ computer games).
Those of my constituents who are refugees have been subjected to the practical instead of the virtual suffering that R18+ nerds seek to inflict for their gratification on the computer screen.
- Michael Atkinson, Attorney-General. Adelaide.
Now, I've read through this a bunch of times, and I've yet to find something resembling a real argument. Just appeal to emotion and name calling. Anyone see it?
Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote











